After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are actually reviving these types of systems. Via lie detection tools tested at the line to a program for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being applied to asylum applications. This article explores just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to steer these devices and to follow their right for safeguards.
It also displays how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering these people from being able to access the stations of security. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post while they assist with expedite the asylum process, they also produce it difficult for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.